FixPhotoQuality vs ImgUpscaler.ai

A strong catalog, and a price we will not guess

The pricing HTML said “Loading plans…” and showed an em dash where a number would go. The free tier was “Limited,” and usage “varies by tool.” No numeric price was visible before JavaScript. On the same day, ImgUpscaler.com published $0, $9.90, and $19.90. Those are not this site’s prices. Copying them across the dot-ai domain would be a convenient fiction.

What we could read was the shape of the site. About 40 English tool pages, including unblur, old-photo restoration, and colorize, plus about 30 blog posts, inside a 338-URL sitemap. The homepage schema included SoftwareApplication, HowTo, FAQPage, ItemList, BreadcrumbList, and Offer. The home title targeted 16K and the meta description targeted fixing pixelated photos. Tool pages we opened did not repeat FAQPage or HowTo.

FixPhotoQuality’s Offer data is the three plans at $0, $12, and $29, in the HTML and in the schema. We do not target 16K. Studio stops at an 8,192 px input edge and an 8× scale. A 16K marketing line is a reason to pick them if you believe the line and a reason to read the 8K page here if you want the division written out.

Colorize is the cleanest fork

They have a colorize tool. So do we: two credits, on the free tool, dyes that are a guess. A black-and-white photograph can still be denoised and enlarged first. If the color is wrong, keep the scan. Their price was not in the HTML. Ours is.

Face enhancement, old-photo pages, and sharpen pages overlap with ours in intent. The difference we will stand on is not “more adjectives.” It is the guest allowance written as three repairs, the download cap written as 3,200 px, the absence of ads, and the 24-hour deletion of both the upload and the result. Their retention window was not stated on the pages we crawled.

Hreflang on their side was uneven: the face enhancer carried two locales, other pages up to twenty, and the sitemap also listed duplicate /ph/ and /pk/ folders. We ship English only. The hreflang map is en and x-default, from one function, in the head and in the sitemap. Planned translations are not given URLs they do not have.

Schema is not a substitute for a number

Their homepage is the richest schema in the set, and that includes an Offer. An Offer whose visible price is an em dash is a strange object. We would rather show $12 in the table than describe a plan the HTML has not loaded. Tool pages here repeat FAQ and HowTo because the steps are different per defect. Repeating the homepage blob on every URL would be volume without a new fact.

There is no aggregate rating in our schema. If theirs is backed by reviews, it is information we do not have an equivalent for. We will not mint stars to match a competitor’s JSON-LD.

Figures on this page were taken from public pages on 2026-10-26. Where a price was not in the server HTML, the cell says so. A failed job here returns the credit. The subscription does not refund. Cancellation is allowed anytime. None of those sentences depend on a script. Take a pixelated file to both tools if you want a quality opinion. Take the price from the HTML if you want a purchasing opinion.

Catalog versus a readable price

Use their tool menu when you need colorize or you were handed a 16K spec. Use this tool when you need to know the price before JavaScript, and when you want FAQ and HowTo on the tool page rather than only on the homepage. Their homepage schema is the richest in the set. An Offer that renders as an em dash is still not a price. We would rather show $12.

Do not merge this site with ImgUpscaler.com in a spreadsheet. The $9.90 figure is the other domain. Hreflang that swings from 2 locales to 20, plus duplicate /ph/ and /pk/ folders, is their crawl, not a template we copied. We ship one language and say so. The photograph still has to survive a slider, here or there, before either catalog matters.

What to keep beside the slider

Use the width of their menu when the job is color or a 16K line you were told to hit. Use the width of our HTML when the job is knowing what a click will cost and charge. Tool pages here repeat the FAQ and the steps because a scan and a screenshot do not share a procedure. Their tool pages, in the sample, left FAQ and HowTo on the homepage. Hreflang that covers two locales on one URL and twenty on the next is a bug we are explicitly not copying. English and x-default are the tags for the pages that exist. The em dash in their price cell stays an em dash.

The decision you can defend

Colorize and a 16K title are reasons to use their menu. A price you can read without JavaScript, FAQ and HowTo on the tool page, and hreflang that matches shipped pages are reasons to stay. Do not copy the $9.90 from the other domain into their cell. The em dash stays an em dash until a later crawl says otherwise.